I'm on two groups in the church whose thinking is coming together - there's a first. One was the Worship and Doctrine Task Group who have ben looking are ordination and now I'm on the Liturgucal Committee who are looking at the ordinal which is a wee book of spcial services one of them bring ordination. We were looking through the service and lots of questions arose about the practice when the service was written and what we think now and need to symbolise now to make things clearer and more united. For example the Presbytery constitutes itself in a separate room, the parades in an takes over the service and sit up fron and it all seems to be about authority and stuff like that. And while it partly is, there are ways and means that are less 'arrogant'.
It got me thinking about what people really think about ordination, the magic that sets someone apart for particular tasks. Personally I have a very low view of ordination. Other's have a high view. What it means in practice for us is that only the minister can do the special bit in communion, can baptise anyone, and bless people at the benediction etc. What say you? Does ordination make sense? Is this setting apart appropriate anymore? What would happen if there were no ordained people?
Recent Comments